|
Post by t0xin_ven0m on Feb 17, 2006 19:54:14 GMT -5
I'll have to go with the PS3 although I'll probably end up owning all 3
|
|
|
Post by ms_marvel on Mar 3, 2006 22:56:49 GMT -5
I will say the Nintendo Revolution because of it's complete backward compatability from Gamcube all the way back to NES.
|
|
|
Post by raven_darkholme on Mar 5, 2006 6:06:36 GMT -5
I'm with Ms. Marvel, Revolution all the way I can upload every single Mario & Zelda game woo hoo!!! and all on one system too!!!
|
|
|
Post by ms_marvel on Mar 5, 2006 13:22:05 GMT -5
yay! the Revolution 2-to-1
|
|
|
Post by t0xin_ven0m on Apr 10, 2006 13:28:33 GMT -5
I think Nintendo is going to be wiped from the face of existance...just like Sega was
|
|
Beany
Local Hero
Avatar Queen[/color]
Why is there no girlandpc avatar?%%EMarvel Original%%
Posts: 630
|
Post by Beany on Apr 20, 2006 10:09:48 GMT -5
*gasp* I love Nintendo! Although, I don't know how great the revolutions will be. Have you seen the controller? It's like a remote control.
|
|
|
Post by t0xin_ven0m on Apr 20, 2006 13:36:33 GMT -5
yeah, I know, ergo..., I think that the system will bomb out if they can't fully ultilize that controller.
|
|
|
Post by comicfreak on May 5, 2006 22:46:18 GMT -5
yay! the Revolution 2-to-1 now its 2-to-2. i don't like those nintendo kind of games. i nevr liked mario or zelda. ps3 all the way. plus god of war 2 will be on it, i hope. plus devil may cry 4. ;D
|
|
|
Post by t0xin_ven0m on May 6, 2006 0:08:06 GMT -5
well, now officially it's called the Nintendo Wii instead of Nintendo Revolution
|
|
|
Post by ms_marvel on May 20, 2006 10:39:13 GMT -5
what a stupid name, they should've kept Revolution
|
|
|
Post by comicfreak on May 23, 2006 15:48:19 GMT -5
its messed up. can u imagine a person coming in and saying he wants to reserve his wii. lol. they make it sound funny and messed up. revolution was a better name.
|
|
|
Post by t0xin_ven0m on May 23, 2006 15:49:35 GMT -5
lol..that is funny. Or to someone who doesn't know what they're talking about says "Do you have one of those wii-wii things?" lol
|
|
|
Post by t0xin_ven0m on May 23, 2006 15:50:34 GMT -5
What's really bad though...none of us have voted for the 360 and it could possibly end up winning the war....
|
|
|
Post by comicfreak on May 24, 2006 8:05:57 GMT -5
they came out too fast. the graphics didn't really scream next gen to me anyway other then oblivion.
|
|
|
Post by t0xin_ven0m on Jul 4, 2006 23:02:56 GMT -5
Well, due to recent 'rumors' online, I think that the 360 will definately come out on top. Due to 1) PS3's Price and 2) PS3's games being priced at more that $60.
I mean, other than the rich and the single, who else has that kind of money to throw around? I know that I don't. I will not pay more than $60 for a game (of course that's also what I said about the PS2 game prices when they first came out too). But I mean, $60+ for a game...it's starting to get out of hand.
|
|
|
Post by comicfreak on Jul 6, 2006 9:53:31 GMT -5
while watching G4 the exact price for a game for the ps3 is $99.99. now because of that i am not getting the PS3 until they lower the price. i'll just get marvel ultimate alliance for the xbox 360.
|
|
|
Post by t0xin_ven0m on Jul 6, 2006 14:10:48 GMT -5
It G4 pretty accurate? I read on IGN from an official Sony statement that they said the games would not be priced at $99.99, but somewhere in between $60-$80.
|
|
|
Post by comicfreak on Jul 6, 2006 16:07:09 GMT -5
well either way there is no way i'm getting a PS3 now until they reduce the prices. if there r any games that r for the PS3 i'll just get them for the 360.
|
|
|
Post by t0xin_ven0m on Jul 6, 2006 16:12:52 GMT -5
I'll wait and see what the game prices are going to be, that will be what determines my verdict. I don't mind paying so much for the console, but the games....that's a different story.
|
|
|
Post by comicfreak on Jul 6, 2006 21:16:03 GMT -5
yeah its bad enough that they would charge $60 for one win i beat games in less then a week. most of them.
|
|